most lab reports of candiduria represent colonization or procurement contamination (often these are good ASP opportunities as they are treated for no reason)
fluconazole is preferred as a candida treatment in urine as it concentrates well (as unchanged drug; highly water soluble; 10-fold times the plasma level!), possibly even as compared to other azoles
itra/vori/posa have terrible urine concentration
article lists flucytosine PO as a valid alternative despite high side effects (concentrates well in urine), but does not appear to be available in Canada
amphoB concentrates well, can also do bladder irrigation
search for predisposing factors when you find candiduria, because you can find things like DM, GU structural abnormalities, deminished renal function… that you wouldn’t have otherwise found!
watch out with asymptomatic candiduria in hospitalized patients, in case they are at risk of it going systemic. Change the catheter!
glabrata and krusei are more likely to be fluc resistant
AmphoB candida resistance is rare, esp in albicans
pilot studies show potential for single 1mg/kg dose that will lead to urine concentrations > MIC for days to months post dose!
lipid amphoB are less nephrotoxic but concentrate worse in urine. potential for tx failure
high relapse after bladder irrigation method, generally don’t use it
the drugs that concentrate poorly in urine may do better for pyelo due to increased renal concentrations, but fluc is still preferred
use at least 400mg of fluc regardless of renal failure. hmm.
so, turns out this article actually doesn’t mention the echinocandins beyond the fact that their role is unclear due to their poor urine contentrations. Oh well, I learned a lot anyway. Will be a good reference to come back to for details on specific GU infections (I didn’t go into the prostatitis section, for example)
Pt with fluc-resistant glabrata in patient also with advanced renal failure
20% chance of glabrata (50-70% chance of albicans)
Micafungin clearance is not affected by renal dysfunction, so it is safe to use in renal failure (especially compared to fluc, amphoB, etc!)
all echinocandins have poor glomerular filtration and tubular secretion = poor urine concentration (think I’ve figured that out by now)
therefore, use has historically been avoided in UTI
still probably has excellent tissue penetration - including kidneys
treated patient with 200 mg daily of micafungin, double the usual dose. Trying to achieve higher renal concentration. No adverse effects were seen
this dose is formally indicated for invasive candidiasis not responding to standard dosing
pt also had hypoalbuminemia; would have had more free serum micafungin, possibly contributing to the treatment success
The 2016 IDSA guidelines for Candiduria do not recommend echinocandins, amphoB is preferred (non-liposomal, 1-7 days!). They may work if upper infection is suspected, but are still last-line. There are mentions of case reports of treatment failures for glabrata UTI.
My take-away: we should be preferentially using amphoB (non-liposomal) for symptomatic candiduria when fluconazole is not a valid option for whatever reason. Will definitely not be putting UTI on the recommended indications list for caspo/mica.
Linking those amphoB dosing studies here for future reference (not super relevant for this research)
Trying out a new post type. I keep track of a few days of interesting links from MedPage Today emails (they have great summaries!) in a draft post and jot do...
The issue comes up a lot lately on Stewardship rounds regarding antibiotics in palliative/”comfort-only” care. Often we see orders like “discontinue all med...
Just been catching up with Dr. Mark Crislip’s Puscast. Checked out a few of the references he linked to in the most recent one. Not really a reference I supp...
Leave a Comment